The penalty order
Put the decisions side by side and one thing stands out immediately. The largest penalty in the set, $60,000, was for unregistered assistant — a registration breach, where an unregistered person was put in front of clients who believed they were dealing with a registrant. The 5 decisions about physically getting into someone's home — a lockbox code handed to a client, an entry outside the booked showing, a showing run at a tenanted property with nobody's consent — run from $6,000 to $12,000, with a median of $6,500.
So on this evidence, the largest penalty in the set is about 9.2 times the median penalty for getting into someone's home without permission. Both kinds of conduct matter, and a single decision is never evidence of a policy. It is the ordering that is worth asking about, and the ordering is not visible from any one decision — only from the set.
All 15 decisions
Newest and largest first. Each name links to the plain-language record, and every record carries RECO's own PDF of the decision.
| Registrant | Released | Subject | Code sections | Fine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Alex Ananthie Alex (registered as Anna Alex) | 16 February 2024 | Unregistered assistant Someone who was not registered | Code of Ethics ss. 3, 4, 5, 17, 37(1), 37(2), 38 and 39 | $60,000 |
| Georgia Rayne Carrol Georgia Rayne Carrol | 30 May 2024 | Tenancy due diligence, commission Advice that served someone else | Code of Ethics ss. 2(1), 4, 5, 13, 30, 36(3) and 39 | $25,000 |
| Mutiat Bello Mutiat Mosunmola Bello (registered as Mutiat Bello) | 14 February 2024 | Purchases beyond a client's means Advice that served someone else | Code of Ethics ss. 3, 4, 5, 38 and 39 | $23,000 |
| Antone Liu Shuxin Liu (registered as Antone Liu) | 17 March 2025 | Appeal dismissed Conduct toward others in the trade | Code of Ethics ss. 3, 35 and 39 | $20,000 |
| Mustafa Zia Mohammed Mustafa Zia (aka Mustafa Zia) | 23 February 2022 | Undisclosed interest in the buyer Not saying whose side you are on | Code of Ethics ss. 2(1) in respect of s. 16, 4, 5, 17, 38 and 39 | $20,000 |
| Jeff Blackham Jeffrey Patrick Blackham (registered as Jeff Blackham) | 17 April 2026 | Conduct on camera Conduct toward others in the trade | Code of Ethics (O. Reg. 365/22) ss. 1, 2(a), 2(b) and 7 | $17,500 |
| Amy Du Jinghui Du (registered as Amy Du) | 12 March 2025 | Entry to a tenanted home Entering a home | Code of Ethics ss. 3 and 39 | $12,000 |
| Marius Kerkhoff Marius Kerkhoff | 16 January 2026 | Foreign buyer tax not flagged Getting a number wrong | Code of Ethics ss. 5, 8, 9 and 11, and General Regulation s. 22.1 | $12,000 |
| Khurram Aziz Khurram Aziz | 12 January 2026 | Status certificate Getting a number wrong | Code of Ethics ss. 4 and 21(1) | $9,000 |
| Jas Gill Jaswinder Singh Gill (registered as Jas Gill) | 31 October 2025 | Soliciting listed sellers Conduct toward others in the trade | REBBA Code ss. 7(1), 7(2), 39 and 40; TRESA Code ss. 1, 2(a), 2(b) and 7; General Regulation ss. 12.1(1), 12.1(3), 12.1(13) | $8,000 |
| Jasmine Lee Jasmine Mei Ling Lee (registered as Jasmine Lee) | 11 April 2025 | Wrong figure on a listing Getting a number wrong | Code of Ethics s. 38 | $8,000 |
| Kay Dhillon Kuldip Kaur Dhillon (registered as Kay Dhillon) | 19 November 2025 | Showing without an appointment Entering a home | Code of Ethics (O. Reg. 365/22) ss. 1, 2(a), 2(b), 9(1) and 9(2) | $7,000 |
| Rozerin Izol Rozerin Izol | 29 May 2025 | Lockbox entry outside the showing Entering a home | Code of Ethics s. 2, and General Regulation s. 22.5 | $6,500 |
| Devin Keller Devin Todd Keller | 3 February 2026 | Lockbox code handed to clients Entering a home | Code of Ethics (O. Reg. 365/22) s. 2(a), 2(b), and General Regulation s. 22.5(a), 22.5(b) | $6,000 |
| Sufyan Ahmad Sufyan Ahmad | 17 July 2025 | Lockbox code handed to a client Entering a home | Code of Ethics s. 2(a), 2(b), and General Regulation s. 22.5(a), 22.5(b) | $6,000 |
What they are about
Grouped by the conduct at issue rather than by the sections cited, because the same section number covers very different behaviour.
- 5Entering a homeGetting into a property without the appointment, the consent, or the registrant actually being there.
- 3Getting a number wrongA cost, a tax or a document the client needed before committing, missing or unverified.
- 3Conduct toward others in the tradeBehaviour toward competitors, colleagues or the public, rather than toward a client.
- 2Advice that served someone elseSteering a client past the checks and the limits that existed to protect them.
- 1Not saying whose side you are onAn interest in the other side of the deal that the client did not clearly know about.
- 1Someone who was not registeredPutting an unregistered person in front of clients who believed they were dealing with a registrant.
How they were decided
13 of the 15 were decided on an agreed statement of facts — the registrant, with legal advice, admitted the facts and the hearing was waived. 2 went to a contested hearing. One of those was appealed, and the appeal was dismissed with the findings and the penalty both upheld.
This matters for how the set should be read. An agreed statement of facts is an admission, not an allegation tested at a hearing, and it is also not a criminal or civil finding. Our guide to reading a RECO decision sets out the difference.
Why this is kept
RECO publishes its discipline decisions, and then removes them. The registrar has said on the record that a decision comes off the public registry once the statutory five-year minimum has passed. The regulator's own position is that the penalty is served and the record need not follow the registrant forever.
The consequence is that the evidence base for questions like the one above thins as it ages. A pattern across 15 decisions cannot be checked by anyone if a portion of the underlying documents is no longer served. That is the entire reason this archive exists: the decisions here are kept permanently, with the regulator's original PDF attached to each, so the record stays checkable after RECO stops serving it.
Method and limits
Read this before citing it, and cite the limits along with the finding.
- This is not every Ontario discipline decision. It is the 15 decisions published and explained on this site. Absence from it means nothing at all. RECO's own published decisions and its registrant search are the primary sources.
- Every figure is taken from the decision itself, not from reporting about it. Where a decision orders a fine in instalments, the figure recorded is the total ordered.
- Fines only. Most of these decisions also order mandatory education. That is not in the totals, so the totals understate the cost of a finding.
- A small sample. 15 decisions will not support a claim about Ontario real estate as a whole. It supports a claim about these 15 decisions, which is the claim made here.
- Names are as the decision writes them. Where a registrant's legal name differs from the name they are registered under, both are given.
- Right of reply. Anyone named here can answer and we publish it unedited, and we correct errors within two days of being shown the document. We take no payment from anyone to remove, alter or soften a record. See corrections.
- Documents retrieved 6 September 2026.
Download and cite
The data, both formats, free to use:
reco-discipline-decisions.csv ·
reco-discipline-decisions.json
Quote it, chart it, republish it, link it. The only condition is attribution, under CC BY 4.0. You do not need to ask us first.
Canada Brokers Reviews, “What Ontario realtors are actually disciplined
for”, 15 RECO discipline decisions, 2022 to 2026. canadabrokersreviews.com/data/
Every row links to the regulator's own PDF, so nothing here has to be taken on our word. If you are writing about this and want the underlying documents in one archive, or a figure checked, the contact form reaches the editor.