What the decision says
As the seller's representative, Lee posted an incorrect tax amount for the property on MLS, and did not take reasonable steps to verify the tax information before posting it.
The single finding is under section 38, the duty to use best efforts to prevent error, misrepresentation, fraud or unethical practice in a trade in real estate.
- Registrant
- Jasmine Mei Ling Lee (registered as Jasmine Lee)
- Regulator
- Real Estate Council of Ontario (RECO)
- Decision released
- 11 April 2025
- Legislation
- REBBA 2002
- Findings
- Code of Ethics s. 38
- Fine
- $8,000
- Also ordered
- Fine payable by 8 October 2025, and completion of RECO's Introduction to TRESA course.
- Type of finding
- Regulatory Professional conduct. Not a criminal or civil finding.
The penalty
The order was a fine of $8,000. Fine payable by 8 October 2025, and completion of RECO's Introduction to TRESA course.
Why this record matters
This is the smallest set of facts in these records, and useful for that reason. No dishonesty was found and no client lost a deal, yet an unverified number on a listing still drew an $8,000 fine. Section 38 is a duty of care about accuracy, not a finding of fraud, and the difference matters when reading any decision that cites it.
Related reading: our guide on this, or the full index of records.
This is a professional-conduct decision by a regulator, not a criminal or civil finding, and it concerns the specific events described in the document. It says nothing about conduct before or after them. Parties the regulator anonymised stay anonymous here. If you are Jasmine Lee, or represent them, we will publish your response in full and unedited: see corrections and right of reply.
Source. Discipline decision of the Real Estate Council of Ontario, released 11 April 2025. Retrieved from the Internet Archive's capture of RECO's published decisions list on 6 September 2026 and republished here unaltered. RECO's own copy is at registrantsearch.reco.on.ca.