What the decision says
Dhillon accessed a property and conducted a showing without an appointment, and without the consent of the seller, the seller's representative, or the occupant of the property.
The findings run through integrity and courtesy under section 1, unprofessional conduct under section 2, and competent service under section 9.
- Registrant
- Kuldip Kaur Dhillon (registered as Kay Dhillon)
- Regulator
- Real Estate Council of Ontario (RECO)
- Decision released
- 19 November 2025
- Legislation
- TRESA 2002
- Findings
- Code of Ethics (O. Reg. 365/22) ss. 1, 2(a), 2(b), 9(1) and 9(2)
- Fine
- $7,000
- Also ordered
- Fine payable by 19 March 2026.
- Type of finding
- Regulatory Professional conduct. Not a criminal or civil finding.
The penalty
The order was a fine of $7,000. Fine payable by 19 March 2026.
Why this record matters
One of five records here involving entry to a property that nobody authorised. In this one, no lockbox misuse was alleged; the showing simply happened without anyone's agreement. The occupant is named separately from the owner in the finding, which is the point: consent has to come from whoever actually lives there too.
Related reading: our guide on this, or the full index of records.
This is a professional-conduct decision by a regulator, not a criminal or civil finding, and it concerns the specific events described in the document. It says nothing about conduct before or after them. Parties the regulator anonymised stay anonymous here. If you are Kay Dhillon, or represent them, we will publish your response in full and unedited: see corrections and right of reply.
Source. Discipline decision of the Real Estate Council of Ontario, released 19 November 2025. Retrieved from the Internet Archive's capture of RECO's published decisions list on 6 September 2026 and republished here unaltered. RECO's own copy is at registrantsearch.reco.on.ca.